Reference for Bava Kamma 133:8
אמרי התם איכא שינוי השם דמעיקרא טיבלא והשתא תרומה הקדש מעיקרא חולין והשתא הקדש
should it not also be the same? — There, however, the law of a receptacle applied to it while it was still detached, whereas here it was never subject to the law of a receptacle while it was detached. An objection was raised [from the following]: If a thief, a robber or an annas<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The same as the hamsan, who, as explained supra p. 361 is prepared to pay for the objects which he misappropriates. ');"><sup>15</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy